our digital manufacturing ecosystem
Global Manufacturing Network
People on the ground
3D Printing Materials
Urethane Casting Materials
Digital Manufacturing Resources
Learn about fictiv
DFM for CNC Machining
2020 State of Manufacturing Report
Introducing Fictiv Radical Transparency: An Industry-First Solution for Production Visibility
Thank you for subscribing!
Testing & Analysis
Software and hardware engineers alike have heard some form of this advice: “Build lots of prototypes; iterate as fast as you can.”
For those of us in the hardware industry, these prototypes can cost a lot of time and money. So while we should strive to iterate quickly, we must also get as much information as possible out of each round of prototypes to inform improvements in the next iteration.
This is the purpose of hardware testing.
If you’re an Industrial or UX Designer, you might be most familiar with user testing. If you’re a Mechanical Engineer, you might picture things being smashed to bits (and it’s oddly satisfying). Electrical and Firmware Engineers might think of a bed-of-nails fixture.
All of the above are part of a comprehensive test plan for hardware products—different tests are beneficial at different stages and each test is an indispensable part of the hardware development process.
In this introductory article, I’m going to give an overview of the different types of tests to consider at each major stage of hardware product development and share some best practices for building a testing schedule to help you get started.
With even the crudest prototypes, you can do a lot of useful tests. There are 3 major test types you’ll want to build into your schedule during early stage development:
Here’s an example of what some early stage tests might look like for a mobile phone product for kids:
These tests will give you the feedback you need to iterate on your designs and ultimately build a working prototype.
As your prototypes become closer to the real thing, your tests need to evolve as well. Pre-production builds (EVT, DVT, PVT) give you prototypes that are much closer to the final product vision.
With these high fidelity prototypes, you can finally do system-level stress tests, environmental tests, and life tests. Compliance certification tests (e.g. FCC, CE) can be done at this stage as well.
Here’s an example of some of the proto-build stage tests you might do:
To develop these tests, you’ll want to work in partnership with your contract manufacturer.
Testing doesn’t end as mass production begins. On the contrary, testing needs to continue to happen for as long as the assembly line is still running.
Testing during mass production has a very different purpose: to ensure that the 10th and 50,000th product coming off the assembly line are the same (sameness being a range, but that’s another topic for another article!).
Note that some tests can and should be performed on 100% of the products before they leave the factory, but destructive tests cannot, so a statistical approach needs to be taken.
As you plan out your product development schedule, it’s crucial to budget ample time and manpower for testing like any other development step.
At the very least, make a list of all the outsourced tests you wish to have done before EVT, then use this list to get quotes and lead times so you can plan ahead.
Here’s an example of what a portion of your testing schedule might look like:
Note that it’s important to build testing lead times into your schedule in addition to time needed for design changes if the tests uncover something that needs to be improved.
Here’s are some of the major considerations to remember when building your test schedule:
For some tests, complete units are not required so having a test plan can help you budget the number of finished goods needed from each build. For example, UV tests and abrasion tests can be done with just the cosmetic components.
Regardless of whether the test requires complete units or individual components, it’s important to provide enough test samples so you have confidence in the results.
A complete suite of standard environmental tests can cost thousands of dollars. In addition, you might want to build custom fixtures that simulate the unique use cases of your product, which cost money and significant man hours.
In my experience, fixtures make great intern projects as they are self-contained and short-term.
Every software team needs dedicated QA (quality assurance) engineers and it’s no different for hardware teams.
It’s quite common for small engineering teams to not have QA resources during the design phase, but as mass production gets closer QA is an indispensable role in the manufacturing operations team.
Don’t rely on your contract manufacturer to take complete responsibility of QA, as there is an inherent conflict of interest. A mass production test plan should be a work of collaboration between in-house QA and the contract manufacturer.
Taking the time to test designs early in the product development process always saves time and money later on.
On the other hand, skipping tests during the design phase carries the risk of a huge reset when problems are uncovered during the pre-production stage and when the cost of change is high. In the worse case scenario, paying customers could discover flaws that should have been caught well before the factory started churning out hundreds of units per day.
Don’t tempt Murphy’s law: design a test plan and dedicate ample resources to testing so your final product meets your, and your customers’, standards.