our digital manufacturing ecosystem
Global Manufacturing Network
People on the ground
3D Printing Materials
Urethane Casting Materials
Digital Manufacturing Resources
Learn about fictiv
2020 State of Manufacturing Report
GD&T 101: An Introduction to Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
How to Accelerate Your Engineering Builds (and Ensure You Get Parts That Fit)
Thank you for subscribing!
There are lots of different exciting advances in prototyping and machining technologies on the horizon.
For this article we’re going to take a deeper look at one advanced technology we hear a lot of buzz around: Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS).
Read on for an overview of the method, the technical specs, and our views on what current challenges and opportunities exist that contribute to where we are now and where we still need to go.
Metal properties have always been strongly linked to their method of manufacturing and even just a few years ago, the idea that 3D printing could produce parts with properties rivalling that of cast and forged pieces seemed crazy.
New technologies and materials continue to push the bounds of what’s possible and although the bleeding edge is fascinating, we the engineers are generally more interested in what’s available and cost effective right now.
There is more than one way to additively manufacture a metal, but there can be some confusion as to what those methods are since different companies can have different names for the same process.
Many companies offer a ‘3D printed metal’ service, however it involves the use of a binding material and is mostly for visual purposes – the mechanical properties will not match the typical values of the metal and machining is not advised.
For metal parts with properties similar to those from subtractive manufacturing methods, you can choose between Electron Beam Melting (EBM), Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS), and Selective Laser Melting (SLM). To be even more confusing, DMLS and SLM are sometimes used interchangeably!
For this article, we’re going to focus on the pros and cons of DMLS, the most widespread technology available.
DMLS is a very new technology first developed in 1995, but not advanced enough to produce commercial products until 2006. Like all additive manufacturing technologies, building begins by slicing a CAD model into thin layers. DMLS, like SLM and EBM, works by running a heat source (laser beam) over micron-thin layers of metal powder in the shape of the design to fuse them together
With EBM and SLM, the material is fully melted whereas in DMLS, the material is heated just enough for the molecules to fuse together. All three technologies are capable of producing parts with over 98% density and leftover powder can be reused repeatedly so waste is low.
For metals as with other materials, prototyping and low production volumes are crucial to successfully designing your part for larger production runs. With material improvements, DMLS has a lot of potential.
As with any developing technology, prices are high and availability is low, including availability of skilled DMLS manufacturers, especially for specific materials such as titanium. Low demand means manufacturers have to program separate builds for each client rather than bundling together to reduce costs, which means higher prices for the client.
With prices this high, even though the material properties may be as good as machined or forged parts, DMLS is not a cost effective prototyping method unless your part can’t be made any other way. Improvements in the machines and expertise are always being rolled out and prices are dropping, but we probably have at least 5 years before it becomes a real prototyping option for consumer products.
Unless your design hits several of the points in ‘Opportunities’ above, DMLS is probably not the method for you.
As prototyping systems for metal are more expensive than for plastics, it makes sense to use 3D printing to refine issues of shape, tolerance and fit before moving on to functional prototypes made with more robust methods. When you have your part fitting correctly, you can start to look first at machining and then investment casting in later stages of development. The most cost effective method will depend on your part design – ask the team at Fictiv if you need help deciding.
DMLS is an exciting technology and although it’s easy to become enamored with the possibilities, for now it’s not a cost effective solution for most designs.
It will be exciting to see Improvements to the technology in the near future as well as advancements pushed through by the aerospace, biomedical, and defence industries to push down cost for consumer hardware development.