our digital manufacturing ecosystem
Global Manufacturing Network
People on the ground
3D Printing Materials
Urethane Casting Materials
Digital Manufacturing Resources
Learn about fictiv
2020 State of Manufacturing Report
GD&T 101: An Introduction to Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
How to Accelerate Your Engineering Builds (and Ensure You Get Parts That Fit)
Thank you for subscribing!
The most popular question we get at Fictiv is around 3D printing material choice: “Which material is best for my project?” Each material has its own benefits and drawbacks, and it can be hard to make a decision without holding and seeing the material for yourself.
You’re always welcome to come by the Fictiv office in San Francisco to take a look at samples, or take a look at the Fictiv Capabilities Guide, but as the next best thing…we have videos!
Here’s a high-level overview of the specs for each material + a quick showcase video, so you can get a feel for the resolution, aesthetic, and functionality of each.
Pros: Cheap, rigid, and non-toxic
Cons: Low resolution
Great for: Testing initial form
Pros: High resolution, easy to sand and easy to paint
Cons: Not great for mechanical functionality
Great for: Visual Models.
Pros: Uses a wax support system, so really easy to melt away support material for accurate geometries
Cons: Counter to its name, it’s not actually very clear / transparent
Great for: Strong and accurate parts; Parts that have complex internal geometries
Pros: Relatively clear and not too expensive
Cons: Still not 100% transparent (somewhat foggy); If you need a completely transparent material, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Great for: Most enclosures and light pipes (check out this post to see how VeroClear works for light pipes)
Cons: Not stretchy
Great for: Functional prototypes that need a rubbery material in the overmold
Pros: Strong and durable
Cons: Not a smooth finish; Has more of a fine-grit sandpaper feel
Great for: Functional parts, fixtures, and high strength-to-weight parts.
Pros: Low cost like PLA but with a slightly higher resolution
Cons: Still prints with a fairly low-resolution finsh, so not great for visual models
Great for: More complex early-stage prototypes that need to be low in cost
Pros: High resolution, high strength & high temperature tolerance
Great for: Functional prototypes with mechanical parts, such as gears; Great for parts that require tapping or mounting
To get an instant quote for 3D printing in any of these materials, create a Fictiv account here.